Sponsors

Insights
Jan 26

Written by: Insights Account
1/26/2010 9:26 PM

By Carol Clurman

 

For my first column for Capitol Communicator and for the new decade, I thought it appropriate to take a quick look at what changes lie ahead in the media mindset. Here’s my take on what’s new for 2010 and what’s being left behind in the rubble of the oughts. Here goes:

Oucht: Only fools like Ashton Kutcher tweet.

In: Twitter is actually cool! The New York Times is No. 20 (2,301,791 followers) on Twitter’s most popular users list, not that far behind Britney Spears (No. 2; 4,242,681) and, well, the reigning champ himself, Ashton Kutcher (No. 1; 4,388,662).

The reason: It’s good for business! The corporate world was ahead of so-called old media on this one. Old media folks have realized that Twitter is more than the sum of its 140 characters. You can actually link to other stuff, like the publication you work for, the blog you are hoping someone will or to your 2,000-word take-out on what’s really happening in Yemen. Plus, followers mean fans mean you might be a marketable commodity. A new concept in this crumbling world of journalism. David Carr has a great take on  the Twitter Takeoff among journos: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/03/weekinreview/03carr.html.

Oucht: Content is still king.

In: Content is in deep, deep trouble.

The reason: I used to think that newspapers and magazines weren’t dying, just the delivery system was changing. The truth is, while that change evolves, most of us have changed with it. They way we read has changed, the way we look for information and we expect information to be presented has changed. Everyone under 30 is now hardwired for bits and links and customized homepages and blogs and instant feeds. They live online and are hardwired for the way it works. Everyone else must and is trying to adjust to their reality — and that includes learning how to write and post and videotape and multiplatform every story for that audience – which is far different than a 30-inch, inverted paragraph story with a lead and a nut graph.

Newspapers continue to hemorrhage at breakneck speed. Perhaps the latest is a report in The Wall Street Journal that MediaNews Group, which owns The Denver Post and the San Jose Mercury News, plans to file for bankruptcy any day. And the Internet still doesn’t pay. Also, The New York Times will charge to read it online. It may be part of a deal with Apple and its new tablet.

Oucht: Print is dead.

In: Wait — not so fast.

The reason: Newspapers, magazines and all matter of things on paper, including books, will endure! The savior: the aforementioned Apple tablet will be far more than the digital, tabloid-sized readers of yore. It will supposedly leave the clunky Kindle digital reader in the dust. It will be the sleekest, lightest, most portable, multi-functional computer to date — possibly ushering in the new world of total media convergence. But for newspapers, still struggling with how to reconcile print and Internet, it could be a reincarnation — a real convergence in the old fashioned sense, of print and digital.

The point is for newspapers, magazines and TV — all of media, for that matter — this new cool device could save media of all kinds. That, at least, is the latest hope. A ray, or rather, an iSlate of sunshine for journalism.

And with that — we truly enter a new era of media in 2010. Uncertain, scary, sad, exciting and profound, no matter how you look at it. Stay tuned.

 

 

Carol Clurman is senior editor of USA WEEKEND Magazine, the national Sunday newspaper magazine based in McLean, Va.. Carol specializes in entertainment and newsmakers for the magazine, where she has been an editor since 1990. In her tenure there, Carol has corralled as well as interviewed everyone from presidents to Penelope Cruz to the pope (well, not quite - yet). Her career in journalism started as the researcher for the media book The Powers That Be by Pulitzer-Prizing winning author David Halberstam. Before joining USA WEEKEND, she worked as a national news reporter for USA Today. (Carol is married to Paul Duning, publisher of Capitol Communicator.)

 

Tags:

1 comments so far...

Why your web site will probably fail

Why your web site will probably fail
And how to stop that from happening

Littering the landscape of the internet are large decomposing carcasses of web sites that failed. No one visits them. They don't function. They just lie there in the dwindling twilight.

What happened to them? How did sites started with enthusiasm end up like this? What mistakes did well-meaning but naive people make?


Getting giddy about technology

You hear the terms thrown about. Social networking. Blogs. Drupal. WordPress. Content Management Systems. I have seen people get tears of joy in their eyes talking about Web 2.0, Flash, and the new interactivity. These same people get worked up into a frenzy on the blogs about a new release of something or other, and how could anyone use the old stuff!

Calm down, folks. It's just computer code. It will not feed your kids nor bring on world peace.

The technology has now turned into a problem. The web started as a simple text and picture thing because of the low bandwidth. Someone needed information. They went and read it, maybe looked at a picture. They got all they needed.

And what the heck is wrong with that?

Now people add Javascript menus, Flash animations, active server pages, XML, and much more to something that was so simple and useful. Sometimes these things are needed. But often they are not, or they could be done in a much simpler way. And you know what happens when you add a bunch of cluttered, bug-ridden, unnecessary junk to a web site?

Nothing. Yes, nothing. No one buys anything. No one reads it. No one cares. Because someone else is doing the same thing, but doing it right. Your viewers hit the "back" key and get the heck out.

This is not a mystery. Customers state in survey after survey that they hate over-complicated, cluttered, buggy sites and prefer sites that are simple and easy to use. So why do designers and developers keep adding unnecessary junk?

Because they are not enlightened, like you just became. How do you avoid this kind of dead web site? Focus on what the viewers want. Not what you want. Not on what the boss wants. And nothing else. Then do it with the simplest technology that will work. HTML (the language of the web), CSS (Cascading Style Sheets add consistent formatting and more), and an email form is ALL YOU NEED for a straight informational site. If you are selling something online, you need to add a shopping cart. There are times when viewers might benefit from an animation, or pages customized to their choices, or the like, but do it in the simplest possible way. And heaven help us, don't have a Flash intro.

The advantages of a K.I.S.S. web site are huge. Much better customer response. Much lower design and development costs. Much less troubleshooting and incompatibility problems among browsers and operating systems. Much easier to update, adhere to usability standards, and make the web site secure, if needed. Much simpler to make 508 compliant (accessible to the disabled).

Just plain smarter.




There never was a reason for the web site to begin with

Too often I have heard people say "I have a web site. Now what do I do with it?" They have this backwards. You don't make a web site, then figure out what to do with it. You have a reason for the web site, then make it. A company needs to use the web site and other elements of the internet as part of a marketing plan. Government agencies and nonprofits also need to achieve specific goals with an organized, detailed plan. The web is only a tool. Something ELSE is what you really want to do.



The wrong people are working on it, with vague job titles

Web design and development is such a new field that people who had been pretty competent managers in the past really don't know what to do with it. You can tell this from the employment ads. One of many problems is that the job titles get all blurred. A job will require a few programming languages, excellent graphic design skills, AND writing skills. This type of job description will turn a web site into a carcass pretty fast. Programming, graphic art, and writing are different and separate professions, requiring radically different training. Although there may be some multitalented people who can handle more than one skill, they are very rare. If you use a programmer for graphic design, you are going to end up with a really bad design. If you use a graphic designer for writing, you are going to end up with really bad writing. And no customers.

In addition, we have the "on-the-cheap" people who want to get a college intern to do programming, design with Dreamweaver, deal with Drupal content management, set up blogs, edit Photoshop files, write great promotional text, and fix the transmissions in the other employees' cars for eight bucks per hour. These people say they don't have the money to pay a professional to do the job for real. Well, wouldn't they notice this really big financial hole in their business plan and avoid starting the business until they were ready? Or perhaps there was no business plan and they don't have a clue what they are doing. I have known many companies that have hired high school and college students on the cheap. None of them are in existence now.

Have a plan that includes a project manager, programmers, designers, and writers as distinct jobs. If your site is small you may be able to use qualified freelancers. Set up a budget and a schedule. Be sure you can pay market rate, and can compete with the hundreds of other companies who desperately need the same people. Hunt down the really great people, based, more than anything, on the work they have produced before (all pros have web portfolios). The project manager needs to have once worked in one of the other fields. During my 31 years in media production, I have only seen managers succeed who had already worked in one of the fields he or she was supervising. How to lure top talent? Pay well and on time. This is number one. Be organized. No one likes to work on a chaotic project, although everyone does, since chaotic projects are more the rule than the exception. Make the project fun and be easy to deal with. Get flexible with scheduling and telecommuting. As long as everything is done on time, what do you care what time of day someone does it? You will lure great talent out of the woods with flexible scheduling. Work on projects that are worthwhile and creative. And then let me know, because I would love to work for you.



Looking like just another template

People got excited when templates for web sites came out. "Oh goody, now I don't need to learn anything or hire a web designer. I will just use a template and stick stuff in it." Sure, great deal. Go for it, as long as you don't want to stay in business.

When a viewer goes to your site, they get an immediate impression of what you are about, based on the look and any large text. You want to be fresh and original and attention-getting (with a clean, simple site). You want to "set a mood" for what the viewer should expect that is tailored to what you are communicating. You want to use images and color and composition.

Are you really going to get that out of a template? Or are you going to look like an unprofessional organization with a generic site that considers its viewers such a low priority that you couldn't be bothered to learn anything or hire a web designer? On top of that you probably have an overcomplicated site (templates tend to be that way) that has viewers running for the hills.

Consider another approach. If that first impression, customized to your message, uses images and color and composition (plus a bit of text), then guess what? It is art. It needs to be designed as art, using illustration, photography, and composition skills. If you don't have these skills, find someone who does. I know many web sites are not designed this way. It is one reason they die.



Writing is low priority

Writing is the most ignored part of a web site. A company might get excited about the programming and design, and then just slop some text in there.

Viewers do not visit a site to see how the programming works. They really don't go to look at the cool design. They go to read the text. It is the most important part of the site.

The text needs to be concise, well-organized, and focused only on the site's goal. It needs to be interesting and maybe entertaining. It should not sound like a government document (government documents shouldn't sound like government documents). No passive verbs. No overlong sentences. No "impact" used as a verb. I am writing right now in a casual, direct-to-the-public style that doesn't even demand complete sentences. It is more like ad copywriting. This is not the right style for everything. The style depends on the targeted audience.

The text also should not be in one long document, even with a table of contents. This is THE WEB, not print. Break it down. Make it work as web pages. But do not have multiple layers of links. Viewers hate that. Organize it from the viewer's point of view, not yours.



Really stupid forms

Many forms on the web spit out error codes, demand information obnoxiously after being filled out that they never asked for to begin with, and are cluttered and confusing. This does not lure customers. It drives them totally insane. There is no quicker route to becoming a dead web site. You need to design the form as a simple, logical thing, and use a programmer who is experienced at this, if you are not. You also need to test the form with different browsers, on different computers, and on both Mac and PC (along with the rest of the web site).



English-only sites

Almost everything in the United States is now English-Spanish, except web sites. Whether you like it or don't like it, a very large and growing segment of the population prefers Spanish. And all those customers/viewers do not go to your site. You are also missing out on many other immigrant groups, and on possible viewers in other countries, by being English-only. If you possibly can, it makes sense to have the site written, not just translated, into other languages, with the content altered to fit the culture.



So . . . get excited! You can make a web site work. You just need to do it carefully and think it through. You need to do much more than what is outlined here to get people to come to your finished site. They won't come just because it is there. You also need a marketing plan. But the web site is the place to start. And yours will stand out. Because most of the other ones are only carcasses.


Patty Zevallos
media producer -- web, video, print
writing, directing, design, illustration, layout
located in the Washington, D.C. / Northern Virginia area
Visit www.pbzproductions.com to see her Green Living site, which uses only HTML and CSS, and her resume / portfolio site, which adds a Flash animation but it is subtle. See if you can find it.

By Patty Zevallos on   3/10/2010 11:42 AM

Your name:
Title:
Comment:
Add Comment    Cancel